Duracellvs Energizer was one of the headline tech fights of the ’ eighty , as Walkmanseseses chewed through cellular telephone after cell . Today , a better match up is the one between their rechargeable stamp battery .
The Energizer AA batteries are rated at 2200 mAh and the Duracells at 2000 mAh ( that ’s milliampere - hours , a measure of Department of Energy charge ) . But the Duracells last a portion longer .
I tested using an ICON LED torch , this substantial aluminum fashion model with gamey and low context — the gamey scope kill a standard battery in about 3 hours . Through several visitation using unlike cell , the Energizer survive 2 to 3.5 hours , while the Duracells took anywhere from 5 to 6.5 hours to drain . Not an peanut divergence , and contrary to the respective charge ratings on each .
TheDuracellfamily of rechargeable shelling also come precharged out of the package , so that ’s very convenient . They ’ve also got USB ports for charging USB gadgets . Both companies propose railway car and 15 minute battery charger . The Duracell Mobile charger is my favorite simply because it has a railroad car adapter and a bulwark adapter , and can charge 4 AA batteries or any USB equipment from those sources . ( It does not do 15 min charges , however , but I ’d rather buy extra and have them ready to go . ) The only real drawback is that it ca n’t charge 500 cellphone and 9V bombardment like the giant sized Energizer family battery charger can . Both sort of batteries are NiMH . Duracell claims their batteries will hold their commission for a yr in storage , while Energizer claims only 6 month .
Frills apart , the bottom bloodline here is battery aliveness , and Duracell has a mass more of it than Energizer .
Duracellreview
Daily Newsletter
Get the good tech , skill , and culture news in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
